Part IV: Staring at the Game Thru My Rear View

Part IV: How Coaches Suppress Players Skills

Through out the years of hoop career it is crazy the amount of gifted players that I have seen their whole game suppressed by coaches. I’ve know tons of players that are open gym killers, but then it gets to school ball and they are just another hooper on the team. Why is this, these coaches fill their heads with so many things they can’t do the players don’t know what they can actually do anymore. It has been my observance that coaches on the whole bring talent on a team closer together. Think about it, if you have a coach telling one player (who can really dribble and get to the basket), you dribble too much, stop dribbling. So after a struggle of trying to get the coach to let him play his game the player eventually gives it up and stops using his ability. Now when you see this kid play it doesn’t even seem as if the player has that ability to get to the basket or it doesn’t even seem as if that player is a skilled dribbler. Now you have another player on the team that can’t dribble a lick or get to the basket if his life depended on it. Unless the coach is a total clown (which is not impossible especially in this hoop era) the coach is most likely going to tell this player not to dribble much either. Now you have two players that are barely using their dribble unless it is to improve a passing lane or to simply just move the ball because this is the only time the coaches wants the player to use his dribble. Since either of these players rarely dribbles to the common human eye these players look as if they have a similar skill set. When in fact one kids skill set is head over heels better then the others, however the coach has suppressed one players skills so severely that two players start to have a similar game or play to the same level. I feel that coaches just don’t bring there teams talent level to a common ground; they actually bring the whole level of skill and ability down. Instead of bringing the level of skill up, these coaches choose to bring the level down. What ever happened to rising to the competition, what is up with these foolish coaches? I’ve seen so many players in my day with very skilled skill sets, not be able to use their skills. I’ve know plenty of players who can shoot deep 3’s and hit on a consistent basis, I’ve seen plenty that can come off the dribble and shoot and hit all day, I’ve seen many who can get to the hole when ever they want, but then these gifted players get put in this coaches system, and these players look as if they got the same skill set as Marc “I serve the Water” , the bum sitting at the end of the bench who ends up starting because he literally rides the coach and his system to the end. The sad thing is some of these talented players eventually loose their skills. Think about it, especially if a player plays for a coach for a few years, every year the coach tells the kid not to use his skills that skill the kid has is becoming less and less polished until the kid really doesn’t have that skill anymore, unless he continues to put in hard individual work to keep that certain skill up. I feel that there are a lot of coaches out there that complain about talent level, and feel as if they don’t get enough talented players. Well what these ignorant fools need to see is that they might just have more talented players then they think, however they suppress the best players skills. Of course if you take a players strengths away and make them play on their weakness’s how good are they going to look. Probably about as good as the bum they got at the end of the bench, that the coach will end up playing over the skilled player because the bum is terrible and is willing to do whatever the coach wants to play. What does the coach want, for a player to just pass and run his system, and why wont the bum not play the way the coach wants him, he doesn’t have a skill set to play any other way. The coach tells him don’t dibble, the kid thinks to his bum self “Well I can’t dribble”, the coach tells him don’t shoot the bum thinks to himself ‘well I really cant shoot. Now the talented player hears the coach telling him all these things not to do, and he is looking at the coach with a straight face but thinking in his head, “Man this coach is a fool” Doesn’t he know I can get to the rack all day, doesn’t he know I can spray this trey ball all day. I’m starting to believe these coaches don’t see this. I always figured coaches should at least be able to see the obvious. But I guess not, so maybe as players we need to start telling these coaches. Coach, or fool which ever you prefer at the time, I can shoot coach, I can shoot, I just hit 8 threes in a row I can shoot. Coach I can get to the basket. I just drove to the lane the last 4 times and scored a bucket as easy as 1, 2, 3, 4. Coach I am better then this bum you are playing over me. I played the kid five times one on one and beat the clown every time like he stole something. He didn’t even score three of the games coach, how can you ever think to play this kid over me, the kid can’t hold my strap. I know you’re a fool, you obviously are not seeing the game clear, maybe players need to start cleaning these coaches clocks out, then just maybe over time they will start seeing the game the way its is suppose to be seen, they won’t see it with blind folds over their eyes anymore. But then again, maybe I’m the fool, but I’m just letting you know how I’ve seen the game over my 23 years, just looking at my playing years thru my rear view.
It’s a cold world, Pack your own heat.

Staring at the Game Thru My Rear View Part II

Part II: Do Coaches Know What an Athlete is???

Even though I do feel that white coaches are the worst when it comes to judging a player, I believe a lot of coaches need a reality check. These coaches all today really believe they know what an athlete is, but I beg to differ. All I have ever heard a coach speak of in basketball when talking about and athlete is vertical leap and quickness. Well these simple minded fools are missing a few other characteristics that make one and athlete. In the dictionary an athlete is defined as, a person who is trained or skilled, in exercise, sports, or games requiring physical strength, agility, or stamina. So basically an athlete has skills, strength, agility, stamina and is able to apply them to an activity. All four of these qualities make up an athlete, not just one or two all four. So why is it over the years I have heard so many coaches that I played for when talking about and athlete only talk about speed and vertical leap. If you were thinking to yourself “maybe they were bad coaches”, I would agree with you. But it’s not just the coaches that I have played for that usually just key in on these two characteristics and want to believe that’s the definition of an athlete. So many basketball coaches only see these two characteristics as a player being athletic. The funny thing is the number one thing basketball coaches probably see as being athletic is vertical leap, and that’s not even part of the actually definition. Now I’m not a fool, I know that vertical leap is definitely an attribute that helps to make one an athlete,(and for your information I got hops) however I find it ironic that most coaches harp on that being the main attribute and it actually is not part of the definition. Believe it these coaches aren’t as smart as they try to seem, or they say they are. A lot of them are ridiculously ignorant of a very basic term that they probably use every day. To be and athlete you need all four of the characteristics. Even if you are superior at one that doesn’t make you an athlete, the definition of and athlete isn’t just one of those characteristics. If a coach is going to just sit there and decide how talented a player is by just his vertical leap or speed then why does he even have to watch the players play the game to decide who he wants to play? He may as well just have the players run a 40 and test there vertical leap and who ever has the best results for these tests just play them. Why don’t coaches do this, because that would be ridiculous, there are other parts of the game that make one an athlete, however it almost seems as if a lot of coaches test for those abilities and then just play the ones with the best results ignoring the other parts of what it takes to be an athlete. Coaches misinterpret athleticism so much, and also can’t see if one is even able to use his ability. The coach just sees that the player has maybe a great vertical leap and assumes he is going to be able to use it. I’ve seen so many players over the years that are very quick and have great verticals. However some of these guys couldn’t catch a pass if I handed it to them on a trey. There’s also other guys despite being gifted with these characteristics have no sense of timing what so ever which totally eliminates there ability. This is why the definition of an athlete implies that the player is suppose to be able to apply there skills or strengths to the activity. If one is not able to apply the skills they have to the sport what good is there skill or ability? I believe that being able to apply one’s abilities to the game takes natural instinct. Which would lead to the one thing if I rewrote the definition of an athlete in a dictionary I would add instinct. Because without instinct for the game one is playing, he will not be very good. No matter how god gifted one is, if he has no instinct for the game, he most likely is not going to be able to use his ability very well. Instinct for the game comes with having timing for the game and if one has no timing there ability is going to be pretty useless. Instinct is something that can not be taught. It’s a pretty similar trait to someone’s vertical. Someone who has a terrible vertical is never going to be a tremendous leaper, no matter how much work they put in. That’s just the way it is, a vertical leap isn’t a skill that can be taught, it is pretty much God given. One can improve some what but terrible jumpers can plain out put endless hours of work in and are most likely still not going to be great jumpers. The same goes for instinct probably even more so, instinct is god given. You are never going to be able to teach someone who has absolutely no instinct for the game instinct. Its natural, its something a player is born with, one simply has it or they don’t. There is also another level of instinct that some players have and that would be killer instinct. Not too many players out there have this quality, however the ones that do are relentless, they never give up, and always exploit there opponents weaknesses. Having that killer instinct can make up for so much, this takes a player to a whole other level. Killer instinct can make decent athletes great players, and makes great athletes elite players. A player with this trait should never be overlooked because there is no telling how great of a player he could actually be. A player having that killer instinct can definitely make up for a lesser skill set or even being not as great of an athlete. Again, I’ve have seen many players who seem like they have it all. They have the height, skill set, athleticism, what else would most say one would need. Then I see these kids play and they disappear on the court. Its like there nowhere to be found, they end up getting out played by players you would say are half as good as them, but its because they have no kill in there game, they play the game lackadaisical and soft. To be honest with you players like this you may as well send home too, because they are never going to be a good player because they have absolutely no kill in their game and lack the essential instincts for the game.

Coaches need to also see that just because one guy is superior in one category of being an athlete doesn’t make him better than the next. Why do you think Jordan was not just a great player, but the greatest player to ever play the game? He contained all the things necessary of being an athlete. He was pretty good at every aspect of the game, that’s why he was good. Not just because he could jump, he had a good skill set to back it up. More importantly Jordan had the natural instinct for the game, and even more important than that Jordan had the killer instinct for the game. Jordan was relentless on the court; he would never give up, and would exploit any weakness of his opponents he could find. Jordan would smell the blood and fear of his opponents and go as hard as he could at them for the full 48 minutes of the game. Lots of people talk about the defense pressuring the ball or pressuring the offense, but its players like Jordan that every time they touched the ball on offense they put pressure on the defense. Players who offensively can put consistent pressure on the defense are very valuable, again this is a trait that is natural and can not be taught. Then there’s players like Darius Miles, who was supposedly a superior athlete with a good skill set and excellent size for the NBA. However he never lived up to the hype of his name, why because he had no kill in his game. Pretty much when it comes down to it Darius Miles was soft, played lackadaisically, had no heart, and had no idea what killer instinct could mean. So many coaches take these players hoping to turn them into something; they say they see potential, ignoring the fact that is plain to see that the kid has no instinct for the game. So these coaches waste all this time trying to teach these kids how to play the game, not realizing the reason they aren’t any good is because they lack the natural instinct that can not be taught. These kids don’t know how to apply their ability to the game. If I’m a coach no matter what I’m putting players on the floor that day in day out give me the best performance and production. I’m not going to put players on the floor that maybe have the potential to give the best performance and best production if they find a way to use there skills and ability that day, and if they aren’t able to do this are going to get beat by 30 points. Good coaches put there best players on the floor, the players that are going to give them the best chances to win the game, despite anything else.

conclusion-
I believe coaches today plain out use the term athleticism way too loosely. They quickly assume from the start that a player is an athlete just because they have one strength. This doesn’t make one an athlete, this makes them skilled in one area or have ability in one area; you need all the attributes that make up an athlete to be an athlete. The way I look at it the more attributes a player has that makes up an athlete makes him a better athlete. So even if there’s one guy that’s really good in one area, if the next guy isn’t quite as good as him in that one area but way better him in every other area, that makes him a better athlete. But hey call me a fool, I’m just going by what I read in the dictionary that is used by millions everyday.

Staring at the Game Thru My Rear View: Part III

Just decided to post part III before part II because thats how I felt like doing it.

Part III: Who is truly the selfish one in the game of basketball today?


So many coaches today talk about how selfish players are today in this era. These coaches all want to talk about how players aren’t willing to change parts of their game for the so called “Greater Good of the Team”. But who is really being selfish here. So many coaches stress on players their system, and that the players must change their game to fit into their system. I’ve seen plenty of coaches that don’t want to win, unless the players win the game in their system. I’ve personally have had a coach say that he would rather loose by 30 points then win a game by the style of play that we had played that night. My question here would be who gave this clown a job. Why are their so many coaches like this, why wouldn’t a coach take a win however he can get it. Why wouldn’t a coach play the style of game that is going to give him the best chance of getting a win? I believe a good coach will get a win however he can get it. If I am a coach I do whatever I have to, to win the game. Maybe I got lost along the way but isn’t that the name of the game to win the game. Why does a coach feel bad after winning a game just because it wasn’t won by playing within his system? Don’t these coaches realize that most of them need to win to keep their jobs? It seems some don’t. I will tell you why these coaches don’t want to win any other way besides through there system, because theses coaches are selfish. Too many coaches out there don’t want to adjust their system at all. These coaches need a slap in the face, to awaken them. Don’t these blind buffoons’ see that you must adjust your system to the players, or maybe even do away with your whole system if your player’s style of play do not fit the system. However, most coaches don’t believe this. In fact most coaches will just play who ever fits into their system best even if these players are not the best players on the team. A lot of times they play some of the worst players just because they know those players will run the system. Sorry but if you’re a coach and you’re not playing your best players you shouldn’t be a coach. If you are a coach and you don’t play your best players, obviously winning isn’t as important to you as it should be. Why are you going to burry one of your best players on the bench just because he doesn’t fit into your scheme? A good coach adjusts his game scheme to the best players on his team, and that’s how he plays the game, because when it truly comes down to it that is the best chance the team has to win. The thing is these coaches want to win in their system so they can get the credit for the win. They want to be able to say that their great system was the reason for why the team succeeded. Wrong answer any good coach knows this, your players win games, end of story. But there are so many bad coaches that want to win through their system and end up benching great players and just play terrible players because they are willing to run the system.
Another thing that sickens me to my stomach about coaches is how quickly coaches out there turn their back on the team. When the going gets bad for these coaches they don’t stick it out and buckle down like they stress on their players. If there’s a way out they take it. A great example of a coach doing this, yet it is another example from football would be the resignation of Falcons X-coach Bobby Petrino. When the going got tough in Atlanta without having Mike Vick, Petrino realized it was going to be hard to get Atlanta back to a playoff caliber team. Petrino signed a 5 year deal yet didn’t even last a full season. He was offered a college head coaching position and took it. He basically slapped his whole team in the face and left them in the middle of the season. Petrino wasn’t worried about anybody on the team, or the team at all, he was worried about himself, and his own personal survival. How can anybody like this tell a team how they must work as a team, and must have team unity, when he has no loyalty to the team? There are so many coaches out there just like this, however many have just not been given as great of an opportunity to turn there back on the team so viscously. However if the right offer presented these coaches, I guarantee more coaches than not would quit on their team in the middle of the season. They are only worried about their own survival; this is another reason why they want to win with their system so bad. If it looks as if they are the genius of creating such a great system these coaches think this will earn them opportunities’ to coach at higher levels. What these coaches don’t realize is winning games eventually will get u all the looks you need.

Coaches playing terrible players-
I still can’t come to terms with why coaches play bad players. I had a coach once admit about a player on my team that the player was terrible. However this player actually started some games, and played a lot of minutes. For, what? If a coach admits to a player being terrible, what is the kid even doing on the team? Sorry, but if I’m a coach and you’re a bum, you aren’t getting a jersey for my team. I might let you distribute water to the players on my team (who our on my team because they can actually play the game well) during the game but that’s as close as a terrible kid would get to being on my team. And I might not even let the kid do this; I mean your terrible kid, give the game up, give the dream up and hit the books. So why do these coaches play terrible players. Because just that the player is terrible, so the player is willing to do what ever the coach wants him to do so he can play. So basically, these coaches play terrible kids because they got joystick in their hand with a wire that runs up the kid’s backside, and they can make the players every move for him. That to me is disgusting. These coaches try to give a reason for why the terrible kid plays. 99% of the time the coach gives the lame excuse that the kid plays hard and works hard. I would tell a coach again, you must be blind or plain dumb. These coaches want to believe the kid works hard? Obviously the kid hasn’t been working hard enough you said he is terrible. If the kid is terrible, he is usually terrible for a reason. If the kid doesn’t have any skills it is quite apparent to me, that the kid isn’t that much of a hard worker. Because if the kid was such a hard worker he would have a nice skill set. Come on people this doesn’t take a high intellect or a person of high intelligence to be able to see. So if a person has a sorry set of skills, why do you think this is. To me I would say because the kid hasn’t worked hard enough over his life. The kid obviously hasn’t put in the hours on his own time to work on his skills. Because if he did the kid should be a decent player, yet this coach said he sucked, so the kid sucks. Get rid of the terrible kids; send them home, where the rest of the terrible kids are. He obviously doesn’t work on his game hard enough he’s terrible.
Another reason why I feel coaches are truly the selfish ones in this game today are these coaches are too truly about themselves. These coaches honestly love the feeling of people giving them so much credit (for lack using the term I really want.) Don’t these coaches realize it isn’t about them; this game is about the players. The coaches playing days are over (which hopefully the coach did have playing days otherwise truthfully he should not be coaching) it’s about the players game now. Don’t these coaches realize especially at the lower levels of the game that these kids are not trying to stop playing at the level which they are at? They want to make it to the next level and the next level after that. Well how do most make it to the next level; they usually succeed at the level before that one. But if a coach doesn’t give a player the chance to succeed or makes the player play some ridiculous suppressed role, how are most players going to make it to the next level. The player is going to have to overcome some major obstacles which he shouldn’t have to overcome, and which most players are going to just say forget it and give the game up, which I have seen happen to way too many good ball players over my playing career.

Staring at the Game Thru My Rear View: Part I

Staring at the Game through My Rear-View



Part I: Basketball: A White on White Crime

It’s funny in this day and age how white basketball players are discriminated upon. However they are discriminated against mostly by a group that you might feel is nearly impossible. This group specifically holds white basketball players to a stereo-type. This group of ignorant “INDIVIDUALS” feel that white ball players have to be fundamentally sound, have a respectable attitude, are willing to sacrifice their whole game for the team, have a pure shot, however but only shoot when open, make the extra pass, and play extra hard. They can not see for some reason a white player with some flavor in his game. They are blinded and do not believe it is possible for a white player to have style, flash, finesse, or any shake in their game. They don’t believe it is possible for a white player to throw a no-look pass, shoot a MJ fade-a-away, or come off the dribble hitting the defender off with the hesitation and pulling straight up in the defender face while connecting on the shot. If the player is capable of doing all these things and does these things all well, why should he not be able to play this way just because the color of his skin?
The ignorant group of individuals that I am speaking of is White basketball Coaches. Some might say that this isn’t possible, how can one discriminate against their own race, well walk a day in my shoes and you might just understand. But that’s a WHOLE other story. Now why do white basketball coaches stereo-type white players to certain characteristics? That’s one question I’ve been trying to find out over the years. This past season my assistant coach told my white teammate “Pete Dunbar”, “You’re not from Brooklyn; you’re a white point guard from Indiana, start playing like it.” This was after Pete threw a one handed pass. I didn’t know up until this moment that you had to be from Brooklyn to throw a one handed pass, I could’ve sworn I’ve seen it happen elsewhere. This coach expected Pete to just purely run the offense, be fundamental, shoot open jumpers, and distribute the ball. He wanted nothing to do with Pete if he were to try to be a playmaker for others, he wanted him to just simply distribute. The thing is Pete has play making ability therefore you should let him make plays. If a Coach saying such an absurd comment isn’t stereo-typical, Webster might have to change the definition they have in the dictionary. Another example of white coach’s stereo typing white athletes happened this past season also. Before the game we were in the locker room going over the other team’s line-up. As my coach is telling us about the opponents he comes across one player and part of the description my coach had written on the board about this particular player was that he was white. As I read that and heard my coach say that I was wondering when you are describing someone’s game what does them having to be white actually have to do with anything? I don’t know what it is but some of these white coaches actually think all white kids play alike and if the kid doesn’t play to this certain stereo type they don’t believe the player is any good. Now on the other hand I feel that the white coaches give the black basketball player the first look and at least at the beginning the benefit of the doubt. Now I’m not saying this is the black players fault, actually I feel that at least a black man is catching a little bit of a break somewhere in this society, however I still feel that a coach needs to see a player for the player he is. To me it seems that a black player almost has to disprove that he can play, and a white player has to prove that he can play. I feel that most white coaches assume that the black player is going to be gifted athletically, that he is going to have some street and flair in his game, and that he might not even have the greatest attitude. These coaches I feel let their attitudes slide sometimes because they just feel that was how the player was brought up because of his surroundings. Again here is a coach pre-judging a player before he even see’s him play. What ever happened to coaches watching a player play the game and then deciding the capabilities of the player?

The Black Coach-
Now there is another basketball coach out there that I feel see’s the game at its purest form in this era. That would be the black coach. I believe overall he see’s the game for the game, the player for the player a lot better then most white coaches; he isn’t as ignorant to the game as white coaches are. He watches the player play the game of basketball and see’s what the player can do. He doesn’t have the player’s game pre-determined and then if the players game is different then that they have to try to fight out of a hole to show their true game. He lets the player prove to him what he can and can not do, and what type of player he truly is. The black coach doesn’t let different players have different attitudes he treats every player the same. He isn’t going to let the black player get away with co-ping an attitude, the same thing a white coach might let slide. However the black coach isn’t going to let a white player catch an attitude either, he treats everyone equally. A great example of this is in the movie “Remember the Titans” even though this is a football movie it shows my very point with coaches. The head coach played by legendary black actor Denzel Washington benches a black offensive player for not performing and then not being able to take the criticism he is given. The white assistant coach see’s this and quickly comforts and babies the black player and tells him to come play defense for him a side of the ball the player has yet to ever play. The head coach see’s this and is agitated. He later tells the assistant coach to treat all players the same. He tells the assistant coach not to baby any of the black players because he surely isn’t babying any of the white players. He lets the coach know to never do that again, or to ever undermine his decision making of benching a player, after he tried punishing the player the assistant coach pulled his feet from right underneath him by playing the player on the other side of the ball. After being confronted the white coach finally realizes what he has done, without even really having a clue before as to what he had actually done. Maybe most white coaches out there are like this, they are treating different players differently and don’t even realize it. Maybe they just need a reality check, one good smack up side the head to get them on the right track.

Just Being Real-
I’m just trying to be as real as possible, and tell you the way I see it. Maybe most of these white coaches are right. Maybe most white ball players or the average white ball players aren’t as athletically gifted and have to be more fundamental players to be able to succeed at a higher level in this game. Maybe some of these white players still today are growing up on these Indiana farms, where they have a hoop in a field and so they can only work on their jump shot, therefore that’s all they can do. Maybe these white players still exist where ever since a young kid they have had to give up every bit of individualism they have just to be able to help their family survive and make a living on the farm. So when these kids make a basketball team it isn’t a big deal for them to give up every bit of their game for the team, because they have been giving up everything of there’s their whole life. However there are still those other white ball players out there that don’t fit this script. Believe it or not there are some white ball players from the city, and there are actually several cities scattered around the corn fields of Indiana. These kids have grown up watching A.I., Kobe, MJ, and have been playing street ball their whole life. Some of these kids do have flavor in their game. Some of these white kids are athletic and can make athletic moves. However there’s usually a white coach around to down play this white athlete and rather then saying the player is athletic they use the term crafty because they feel a white player can’t be athletic. Some of these white players can really play the game of basketball with style. However the white coach feels that the white ball player should be willing to sacrifice their whole game for the team, the so called “Greater Good”, give me a break. I believe my boy Pete Dunbar said it best, “I’ve already sacrificed enough”. Meaning by this he has sacrificed his whole life for this game to make himself a better player. Its players like him that have put in the hard days of work and countless hours of being in the gym at ridiculous times of the night to make himself a player, not a white player a damn good basketball player period. After sacrificing so much of one’s life why should any player of any race be expected to give up everything they have worked for their whole life simply because of the color of their skin. Any chump off the street can pass the ball around, run around with their head cut off as if they are playing hard. Players that really play hard, might not really look as if they are playing hard for they have been playing hard in there endless individual time, so when they actually get on the court in the real game it looks as if they are going easy because they are making things look so easy and effortless because of all the hard work they have put in away from just team practices. Why should anyone give up all this hard work when they can really be a playmaker in the game of basketball, and why would any coach of any sort if he has an ounce of a clue, try to suppress any players skill’s that really has ability? This is the question I have been looking for every since about the age of fifteen when I really started realizing how things were in this hoop game. Seven years later at the age of twenty-two and my college basketball career almost at an end I am still looking for this answer.

Clarifying Things-
I just want to make a few things clear for everyone who has read this article clearly. I am not saying that all white coaches discriminate against white ball players; however I am saying a lot do. I am also not saying that all black coaches see the game pure or don’t discriminate against players, I am just saying I feel a lot more black coaches see the game more purely than most white coaches. I just feel that overall these coaches need to start recognizing a player for his skill not his color. The main type of white player I feel gets discriminated the most is a white guard that’s game is defined as a slasher. How many white guards playing the 2 or 3 spot do you see that are slashers. The numbers are pretty low from the beginning. Then I would say how many white players do you see that are slashers that are under6’6. Every inch you go down there less and less of a chance that you’re going to see this type of player. I’m not talking about players at your local fitness club, I’m talking about players at the D-1 level and in the NBA. I don’t think I can name one white player in the NBA that is around 6’3 that is a true slasher. It’s a breed that doesn’t make it for some reason, or over time they are switched from their true game and are formed into a different type of player by their coaches.

Staring at the Game Thru My Rear View

This is a 5 part article of just how I feel (Trent) about how I have seen the game over the years. The first part is Basektball: a white on white crime the second part is : Do Coaches know what an athlete is and so fourth. But there is a total of 5 parts to the articles. I am just going to post one article each week for the next 5 weeks. If your a true hooper you really need to read these articels there is some issues most wouldn't want to talk about, and have yet to have been really spoken about publicly.

High School Basketball Coaches

By: Jake Felton

I have so many things on my mind as i sit here and write this I'm very sure i will forget a few things. I want to start off by saying how many good coaches are there really out there teaching kids how to play and rise to the next level? The answer would probably surprise most but very few. Im talking about the High School level here nothing else. I go to a lot of games and have been for the past 13 years and have seen maybe a handful of coaches that have a clue on how to coach GOOD players. Sure some coaches are blessed with great players but do they really know how to even coach those players? I just struggle to watch high school basketball, i struggle to watch coaches make offense Defense subs late, I struggle to watch a kid dominate in the first half then get the ball a few times for opportunites to help his team win in the 2nd half, I struggle to hear what they say to kids, I struggle how they play favorites because they are so scared to really just let loose and coach, I struggle to watch how their assistant coaches do nothing but clap and sit there when they should be finding ways to get easy scores or recognize miss matches, I struggle to go to a game wondering is this the game they finally coach one good game, then again i think there record doesnt speak for it, they past decade holds no tradition and they dont produce many college athletes b.c they cant run a program to say the least. AAU is truly where its at, you dont go to a high school game and see 20 coaches watching kids, but when you got to a showcase tourny for AAU, there they are waiting at the bit to see who can play at the next level.

That is proof that it shouldnt take a guy who teaches at the school to lead a program, I tend to think it should be the guy working his ass of in his proffession to find enough time to coach a group of kids b.c he has passion not to collect a pay check year by year. I think High School coaches should get paid per win, not b.c they play 500 basketball all year. I just have a lot to say and im sure as time goes even minutes after this I will think of more things to say, but what get's me most is they kill a kids passion, they take how good he is, knock him all the way down and try to build him back up b.c they have no idea how to handle the fact that he can kill, they want system players. Great coaches take what they have and work with it, not try to fit a square piece in a circle hole.

I hope ppl read this and realize to cherish AAU basketball, to help their kids get to the next level, to always keep that passion in your kids, b.c one day you will be saying the same thing I am, and I told you so may not be good enough b.c it all seems good at first, until it happens.

9th Annual Region Roundball

Last night I went to the Region Roundball in Valparaiso, IN. I watched the Crown Point Vs. Winchester matchup. Crown Point defeated Winchester in Overtime, but I didn't go their to watch the teams play. I went to see Stephen Albrecht. I was curious to see this kid, because of all the talk that hes being recruited by UCONN and Penn State. This kid is listed at 6-3. He has a lights out shot, but he is really skinny. I don't understand what these scouts are looking at. Yes he can shoot, but he will be eaten up by division 1 competition. Not only that he probably won't ever see the floor at UCONN. Division 1 scouts really puzzle me sometimes because I wonder what they really are scouting. This kid is Division 3 at best.